With any sort of specialty hobby, you've got enthusiasts.  Some of those folks will spend massive amounts of money for the best equipment they can get.  There are more than a few companies who are eager and willing to take advantage of that.

Case in point:  AudioQuest makes a "high end" HDMI cable that runs $1650.99.  I've no clue what advantage you get for that kind of scratch.  Neither does anyone else, and the reviews have subsequently taken on a David Hasselhoff vibe.

What's great about it: Color matched my shag carpet and futon, allowed me to see further past the visible light spectrum.

What's not so great: Went blind, girlfriend captured by winged livestock, may have unleashed Armageddon.

No, I would not recommend this to a friend.

The truth of the matter is, there's no reason to buy this instead of an off-the-shelf $30 cable.

It always gets worse.

By now, you've likely heard "Friday" by Rebecca Black.  It's easy to criticize on any number of levels.  It's vapid.  It's an idol farm's vanity project to to milk rich parents of their money.  It's overproduced to the point of sterility.  The singer's voice is so saturated by pitch correction that it sounds like fingernails being raked across a blackboard.

In short, it's everything that's wrong with pop music.  But it's also the new normal.  For all the mocking and vitriol, everyone's heard it.

Well, it's official.  Ruger has entered the rather crowded 1911 pistol game. Ordinarily, I'd respond to this with a yawn, but a few factors make me suspect they'll do great things with it.

Jeff Quinn wrote a nice writeup on it, and he sounds optimistic.  It'll have a cast frame, which is little cause for worry since the folks at Pine Tree Castings have been proving the investment casting process to be capable of great durability for decades.  A point of interest is the fact that the plunger tube is cast as part of the frame, which …

Nobody knows for sure what made Clippy snap.  Perhaps it was the cocaine.  Maybe it was the way Steve Ballmer would sneak up and grope him when they were alone in the break room.  For all we know, he hit the breaking point when he turned on the television and saw himself being voiced by Gilbert Gottfried.

All we know is that the 21st century wasn't being kind to Clippy, and he wasn't taking it anymore.

One January morning in 2000, he showed up at the Microsoft offices in Redmond with a Glock 19 and a 33-round magazine.  There would be blood.  Oh yes, there would be blood.

However, Clippy's rampage was cut mercifully short by the fact that he lacked fingers and was unable to operate the gun.  King County deputies arrested him on weapons charges.  He took an insanity defense, and he's currently getting the help he needs.

I wish the same could be said of the Brady Campaign.

In a way, this case is a rematch.  In one corner, we have Alan Gura, who represented us admirably in McDonald v. Chicago.  In the other corner, we have Chicago counsel James Feldman, who utterly crashed and burned in his attempts to argue the city's claims in that case.  Apparently, Feldman isn't willing to settle for one failure in front of the nation's highest court, so he's repeating it here.

The case at hand is Ezell v. Chicago, a challenge to Chicago's ban on the construction of indoor shooting ranges within the city limits.  The ban presents something of a Catch-22, due to the Responsible Gun Ownership Ordinance (also known as the "We're Cooperating As Little As Humanly Possible With The Damn Court" ordinance).  The Ordinance requires that registration of a handgun include

an affidavit signed by a firearm instructor certified by the State of Illinois to provide firearm training courses attesting that the applicant has completed a firearm safety and training course, which, at a minimum, provides one hour of range training

That's a hard thing to do when there are no firing ranges around.  Judge Diane Sykes summed it up best:

We're not talking about regulation.  This is a ban.  The city has simultaneously mandated live-fire training as a condition of licensure and prohibited it.  How can that be permissible, and not a burden of a very significant sort on the 2nd Amendment right?  [19:19]

Audio of the arguments is available here [mp3].