Some folks may remember last summer's dust-up over this. There was a bill before Congress to get the District of Columbia a seat in the House. John Ensign tacked the Second Amendment Enforcement Act onto it, and it became something of a poison pill. Democrats were unable to excise his amendment, and if the District was to get a house seat, they'd have to comply with the Heller ruling.

Rather than risk abandoning the District's unconstitutional and disastrous regulations, Congress chose to simply drop the whole matter completely.

Well, history repeats itself, though rarely this quickly. …

I've had an on-again-off-again relationship with Starbucks for as long as I can remember.  Their prepared drinks are spendy, but as a guy who grinds his own, I've found their Cafe Verona to be very versatile, and the Ethiopian Sidamo balances nicely with steamed milk.

I'd never really considered their policy on guns.  Heck, it's a coffee shop.  It's frequented by pseudo-intellectuals whose offspring are white kids with dreadlocks.  Despite the lack of any signage stating so, I'd always assumed they wouldn't be too fond of guns.

Therefore, it came as something of a pleasant surprise to find out that they're not caving to pressure from the Brady Campaign to ban guns from their stores.

I may have to spend more money there.

Well, it looks like I agree with Sarah Brady on one thing, at least.

The Brady Campaign gave President Obama an "F" rating on gun-control issues in a report issued this week [pdf].

In just one year, Barack Obama has signed into law more repeals of federal gun policies than in President George W. Bush’s eight years in office. From the repeal of Reagan Era rules keeping loaded guns out of national parks to the repeal of post-9/11 policies to safeguard Amtrak from armed terrorist attacks, President Obama’s stance on guns has endangered our communities and threatened our national security.

That first sentence is particularly telling.  Obama knows the new truth when it comes to gun control:  paying lip service to it is a great rhetorical ploy, but attempting to follow through is political suicide.  Now he's in a rather unenviable position: he was expected to support gun control, but he lacks the wherewithal to do so.  As such, he's being branded a turncoat by the very people who put him into office.

Wait until the health-care bill tanks, and we'll really see sparks.  The last half of his term isn't going to be very chipper.

Here it is Monday, and the administration is keeping quiet about the climate-change fraud conundrum.  The only word I've heard comes from climate czar Carol Browner, who stated,

I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real (…) [people calling for action] are a very small group of people who continue to say this isn't a real problem, that we don't need to do anything.

At least she stops short of calling us "deniers" or "flat earthers."

Which is better than I can say for Al Gore.  His new book is called, Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis, and it opens with this happy quote from Deuteronomy:  "I’m offering you the choice of life or death. You can choose either blessings or curses."

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Gore thinks very highly of himself.  He's on a crusade to save us from our own worst instincts, much like his wife was in the 1980's.  He loves to see himself on television, and it's even better that he gets to lecture us from a position of moral authority.

So, they got theirs up just under the wire.  The Brady Campaign brief is pretty much exactly what I expected.

The whole thing is about "reasonable regulation" and "public interest." Without weighing in on incorporation, they simply beg for a standard of review that's as close to rational basis as they can get without calling it such.

They dig pretty deep (Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.?) to prove that strict scrutiny doesn't usually apply across the board for civil liberties, and they seem to encourage such a situation.

If anything, the Left needs to tread very carefully when …

The deadline for amicus curiae briefs in the McDonald case is November 23. Chicago filed for an extension, and their brief is now due on December 30.

Two Senators and two Representatives have drafted a brief in support of the plaintiffs, and we'd like to see it receive as many signatures from other legislators as possible. Please contact your congressmen and ask them to sign this brief.

When FN Herstal came out with the 5.7×28mm cartridge (and the accompanying Five-seveN pistol) a few years back, there was a bit of hand-wringing in certain circles over its ability to pierce body armor.

Bear in mind, the 5.7mm is really a souped-up .22 WMR, not some >5000 ft/s barnburner.  It's not the first (or only) gun made that'll punch through body armor.  Yet, everyone got their panties in a bunch over it.

SA 1618 is an amendment to S. 1390, a bill authorizing appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 2010 fiscal year.  The amendment seeks,

[t]o amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to allow citizens who have concealed carry permits from the State in which they reside to carry concealed firearms in another State that grants concealed carry permits, if the individual complies with the laws of the State.

There are 21 cosponsors including Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Orrin Hatch of Utah.

Naturally, the Left is pissed, which means it stands a chance.

They're sticking to their guns, so to speak. Despite watching their agenda slip away, the Brady Campaign continues to put a sunny face on things. Their response to the 9th Circuit Nordyke decision reads,

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today upheld Alameda County’s ordinance banning possession and sales of firearms on county-owned property, that was enacted to end gun shows on county fairgrounds.

“We are pleased that the court recognized that the Second Amendment does not prevent state and local governments from enacting common-sense gun laws,” said Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

Actually, that's not the case at all. The ruling narrowly allowed Almeida County to ban guns from county-owned property. It did not allow anything further. To the contrary, the main story with the Nordyke case was that the 2nd Amendment is incorporated against State and local governments through the Due Process clause of the 14th.

Of course, they don't want to talk about that.