S. 150

2 posts

Feinstein’s Last Hurrah

Negotiations are still underway in the Senate for a unified package of gun-control bills to be introduced next month. One conspicuous piece of legislation that will not be part of it is S. 150, Dianne Feinstein’s revised Assault Weapons Ban.

Majority Leader Harry Reid excised S. 150 in a meeting on Monday. His rationale was,

Right now her amendment, by the most optimistic measures, has less than 40 votes. I am not going to put something on the floor that can’t succeed.

Does that mean it’s dead? No. Feinstein can still reintroduce it as an amendment to another bill. Though it’s doubtful she’ll get the votes for it, she’s sworn to bring it to a vote one way or another.

What’s becoming obvious is that Reid has an eye on the 2014 midterms, and he’s feeling the heat. He can push a more “moderate” bill to appease the Democratic base while pointing out that he opposed more “extreme” bills like S.

Continued...

Feinstein’s Charity

Govtrack and Thomas haven’t posted it yet, but the full text of Dianne Feinstein’s proposed Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 is posted here. It appears to be numbered S. 150.

The list of prohibited weapons is pretty much what we saw on Thursday, and the list of weapons she deigns to let us keep begins on page 23. We would be granted the privilege to keep historic “assault” rifles like Garands and M1 carbines so long as they don’t have folding stocks or extended magazines. Beyond that, it’s more or less deer rifles and turkey guns. On her reasoning for this, she had this bit of sage insight:

Military-style assault weapons have but one purpose, and in my view that’s a military purpose, to hold at the hip, possibly, to spray fire to be able to kill large numbers.

How very conciliatory of her to leave a few crumbs on the table for the lowly civilians.

Continued...