Pictured below are the sad remains of a S&W M&P 340 revolver. The 340 is a J-Frame chambered in .357 Magnum. Its frame is an aluminum alloy infused with a small percentage of Scandium, and it weighs in at 12 ounces.
The owner fired six rounds of .38 Special through it without issue. The first shot of .357 blew up the gun. The owner was unharmed, as all of the unpleasantness happened forward of the muzzle.
This isn’t a takedown gun, and those pieces aren’t supposed to be separate. The loads were very mild 125gr .357’s. Ammunition was not the issue.
The ejector rod had bent, and the cylinder was stuck shut. Immediately noticeable was this little problem:
The barrel shroud had separated from the frame and was spinning freely. The barrel had torqued itself forward about 3/8″ and since it was already DOA, I went ahead and unscrewed it.
The barrel itself is very light and made of thin steel. It screws directly into the frame, right where the crack appears. This highlights a serious design flaw of this weapon. The area where the yoke meets the frame is far too thin and brittle. Furthermore, the threads in the barrel mate to aluminum threads rather than steel.
A possible fix would be to pin a steel bushing to the frame, into which the barrel can then be screwed. Even then, I’m still not sure that an aluminum frame, no matter how well heat-treated, can hold up to the pressures involved.
This is the second failure of this material I’ve seen, and there are several other documented cases. It may be that the engineers at Smith & Wesson have reached beyond their grasp with this design. The manual warns against using any loads lighter than 125gr, and I’ve heard of lighter loads “jumping” the crimp and lodging against the forcing cone under recoil.
The final concern is recoil. To shoot Magnums in a gun this small and light is to know pain. I’m not exaggerating in the least. .38 Special has an appreciable snap out of the gun, but Magnums not only torque the wrist sharply, they cause the gun to tear into the palm and webbing of the hand. It’s not uncommon for these guns to draw blood from the shooter.
File this gun under “things that seemed like a good idea at the time,” but I can’t recommend it to anyone who plans on shooting it with any regularity. While I’ve no doubt that Smith & Wesson will make things right, the owner will likely be settling on a more practical sidearm.
5 thoughts on “Pushing the Envelope vs. Pushing Your Luck”
It all goes to prove that the latest and greatest isn’t always the best. If you want to launch .357 Mag slugs please use a S&W mod 65 or the like.
Hi there,
could you check wether the original problem was, that the centerpin disengaged from the recoil shield under the recoil of a mangum load? This could lead to a bullet not entering the forcing cone.
Please have a look on my gun:
http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-smithing/114411-sc-340-marks-cylinder-frame.html
Would be nice to hear from you.
Fritz
Fritz, it looks to me like you’re having a different problem. Either the ejector rod or the center pin on your gun are bent. What I find unsettling are the matching marks on the cylinder and frame in this picture:
If you open the cylinder and twirl the ejector rod slowly, do you see any “wobble?” If so, it’s a bent rod or pin. I can’t tell from looking at the recoil shield, but it may also be that the gun is badly out of timing.
Edit: I just saw your last picture, and the yoke is badly misaligned. Frankly, I’m surprised the pawl is able to rotate the cylinder correctly. Please let me know what S&W says about it when you get it back.
This is disheartening :( I really like my S&W model 327 TRR8 and shoot .357 magnum 158 grain through it regularly. However, at about 1,200 rounds it quit firing. When I got it back from S&W the note said they’d replaced the firing pin and repaired the yoke.
I’ve probably fired about another 1,000 rounds since the repairs and hope I’m not heading for a new failure.
I don’t think you have as much reason to worry. Your gun is an N-Frame, and it’s thicker and stronger in places where the J-Frame is not.