Plenty of obnoxious clichés get thrown around in the gun culture, but the most annoying is, “I carry a .45 because they don’t make a .46!” I’m mildly surprised when the simpletons chanting that one manage not to drool on themselves in public.
In fact, I am so weary of it that I’m going to rectify the situation. I’m going to make a .46 caliber handgun cartridge.
Now, you might say that’s a bad idea. Let me tell you something. When George Washington wanted to cross the Potomac and drive the British out of New Jersey, I’m pretty sure some folks told him that was a bad idea. But he proved them wrong, didn’t he? He sent them packing all the way back to California. Smelly hippies. Without him, we’d be spelling words like “color” and “flavor” with a “u.” I’m telling you, that man was a great American.
What was I saying? Oh, yeah. I plan on calling the cartridge the .46 Ginormous Action Tactical. A serious load demands a serious name, and that means using the word “tactical” to the point that it loses all meaning. It also prevents confusion, since “.46 GAT” couldn’t possibly be confused with any current commercial loading.
How’s it going to work? Simple. The operative phrase is “inverse bottleneck.” I’m going to take a .44 Henry case and neck it up to accept a .46 caliber bullet, backed by 26 grains or so of H110. OAL will be about 0.09″ longer than a .460 Rowland (which everyone knows isn’t a real .46 anyway).
You might ask, “how am I going to reload that?” Short answer: you’re not. Stop asking. This is a tactical cartridge, and real operators don’t have time for reloading. Too busy dancing tangos and killing flamingos. Real operators want real tactical knockdown power, and that only comes from a 250gr bullet doing ~1500ft/s.
Yeah, the ammunition’s going to be expensive. So what? Do you want to be “elite” or not? Quit your whining and put on your big boy pants. Elite operators have expensive tastes. Let the proletariat cling to their wimpy century-old cartridges: ours is the path to the future, and the future involves robot concubines and firearms in obscure loadings.
The gun will be built on the 1911 platform, because nothing’s more tactical than a 1911. What’s more tactical than a 1911 is a heavily modified, proprietary 1911 that doesn’t have parts compatibility with anything else. It’s going to be rare. It’s going to cost a year’s pay. And you’re going to love me for it.
You don’t want to know how much extra magazines will cost. If you have to ask, this isn’t the gun for you. I’ll make them when I feel like it. Which isn’t often.
If you actually get one and it doesn’t feed right, it’s somehow your fault. Real operators don’t limp-wrist their guns. They read the manual and use the lubricant I specify, even if it’s only attainable through highly restricted government channels. They follow the 1000-round break-in, which also happens to be the life expectancy of the recoil spring and locking lugs. They don’t cry like Ethiopian famine children when the grip panels shatter. We’ve got ten fingers for a reason: redundancy. If the extractor rips the case head off and flings it into your eyeball, cherish the scar as a memento of how cutting edge you are. Besides, chicks dig scars. I’ll even send you a conciliatory eyepatch with the company logo, which you can wear as a badge of honor and total disregard of frugality.
I might send one to my buddy at one of the gun magazines for review. I might not. If I really like you, I might let you touch one at SHOT Show. Probably not. The future also involves mystery and artificial scarcity. I will, however, take out full-page advertisements in every gun magazine, just so you can be reminded of what you lack on a constant basis.
.46 GAT. It’ll stop flash mobs. It’ll stop bears, secular humanists, and that big hairy thing that whacked Luke Skywalker and hung him from the ceiling in Empire. It’ll be in Flat Dark Earth with flames engraved on the side.
You want it. You need it. You might stand a chance of getting on the waiting list.
13 thoughts on “Now They Do Make a .46”
It’s not a real caliber before Carolyn McCarthy denounces it as a cop killer and LCAV writes a model law banning it.
I’ll give them both a call for ya…
-Gene
Please do. You can’t buy that kind of publicity.
How much of a deposit to get on the waiting list? This new caliber/pistol of yours will probably come to market before the Vltor vaporware Bren Ten.
Sorry Matt, but if you have to ask, you’re just not elite enough.
As far as the Bren Ten, yawn. That’s a 10mm. Mine is 11.684mm. Therefore it is superior.
Erik;
If you have the time could you make me a handgun in .50 BMG? I would like to have a handgun that can take down a charging Humvee at 500 yards. I may go elephant hunting with it also.
Also could you maybe add a belt to the .50 BMG and call it Extreme Tactical .50 Exterminator? I was thinking along the lines of a revolver and a few speed loaders in a back pack.
Feel free to use these ideas as you wish, but maybe you could maybe include my name in the name of the revolver? Daniel’s Deliverer of Devestating Destruction would really sound nice. Thanks.
Daniel, you’re just not getting it. The .50 BMG is so 20th century as to be laughably obsolete. We need fresh thinking and innovation, not more navel-gazing nostalgia for the “good old days.” Frankly, the Good Old Days weren’t all that great, anyway. People kept getting the Plague and the Huns were invading everything. Do we really want to go back to all of that?
I for one say “no.” It’s time for new loadings, and if the public has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, so be it. Revolvers? Really? Anyone with any tactical experience knows that six shots isn’t enough for today’s busy operator on the go. Marksmanship is great if you’re plinking with grandpa on the porch, but real world considerations demand a withering volume of firepower.
My load will do everything the .50 Big Man Girl will, and it will do so with style. Here’s a preliminary rendering from one of my conceptual engineers:
I figure the pony is good for marketing it to the ladies as a self-defense gun. Plus, I don’t think anyone else is marketing guns with a horse logo, so it’s a stamp of uniqueness and non-conformity.
Eric:
I hate to nit pick (well really I do), but the gun you are basing it on is a 1911. That is some what out dated don’t you think. I was thinking of maybe enlarging the frame on my revolver just a little so it would hold 10 rounds. If you think the .50 is too small I would consider a 20 MM. I would have to settle for about eight rounds in it, but that is a small price to pay for the confort of knowing I am well armed. However in a 20 MM it might need a detachable shoulder stock. I will do some more research and get back to you on this. I fear that ammo might be a little hard to come by. Your thoughts on this would be appreciated. Bigger is always better, right?
But mine is an updated version of the design. That makes it modern. Duh.
As per your suggestion, I looked at making a cylinder for 20mm rounds, and it would only hold three shots. I fail to see how that would be the least bit tactical. Furthermore, revolvers have one strategic failing: the lack of options for a vertical foregrip. While one could conceivably be mounted, the operator would burn his hand, since it would be ahead of the cylinder gap. One-handed operators are somewhat limited in their usefulness and versatility, and the last test group filed an alarming number of lawsuits after a previous “oopsie.”
I NEED one of these. Without the GAT .46 I feel like a weakling!
My question is do I have to stay with the standard ammunition, or can I hotrod a few rounds on my highly modified reloader to get the power this gun was born to deliver?
Can you imagine my pride when I explain to my friends and co-workers that upgrading to the GAT .46 was the smartest and safest thing to do. I can easily outline a dozen scenarios where the GAT .46 would save the day when a lesser cartridge would relegate its owner to the ‘also ran’ category.
Wait a minute, they’re building a what? A .47 Magnum? Wow!
Kindly cancel my order. You might as well throw stones as go to a fight with the puny GAT .46 strapped to your back. I need a man’s gun!
You lie! Who’s making a .47? I’ll track him down and punch out all his blood! With the .46 GAT!
.46 GAT is still the most versatile and effective tactical cartridge ever, and it always will be. I’m currently in communication with folks at NATO as we speak regarding the replacement of their wimpy 9mm load with mine. They’re not returning my calls, but it’s a start.
If you want to defend your life and honor with some meager mouse gun cartridge like the .45, be my guest. You will be inadequate in all aspects of life, and when I am done mocking your poor choice of ammunition, I will send flowers to your shamed and bereaved relatives. Until then, do whatever you want. It’s obvious that you have no clue as to the harsh realities of SHTF situations, and I would pity you if I weren’t so busy laughing at your folly.
I just heard that Clint (Dirty Harry) Eastwood is carrying a .47 Magnum. He says it’s the most powerful handgun in the world!
Clint wouldn’t lie! When I think how close I came to putting money down on the GAT .46! What a disaster that would have been!
I suppose I could have used the GAT .46 to hunt squirrels, don’t ya think? Nobody would care if it takes two shots to kill the squirrel.
You mean the old coot who couldn’t even handle full .44 Magnum loads in his movies? I think the poor man might be a bit addled in the noggin.
For the record, the .46 GAT can kill squirrels in one shot. This is the load that gives Marshall & Sanow cold sweats. You’re just jealous because you’re not elite enough for it.
I have taken your well-thought-out criticism to heart. I am working on my eliteness. I won’t stop until I am so friggin’ elite that nobody likes me! Imagine, a steely-eyed killer with no peer group and not weighed down by the baggage of non-elitism.
I’ll do it !!!!
Kindly re-establish my purchase order, and don’t even worry about the optional broken wrist medical coverage. Really elite guys don’t need it!
I’m in.