Gun Control

50 posts

Yep, He Went There

In tonight’s debate, the President was asked point-blank if he’d support a ban on “assault weapons.” His answer was an unequivocable yes. It’s a bit ironic, since he acknowledged that most of the violence in his hometown was carried out with “cheap handguns” rather than AK-47’s.

This places him on shaky rhetorical ground when he claims to support the 2nd Amendment, but the shocking thing is that Governor Romney implied that he’d support it if it “provided opportunities for both [sides] that both wanted.” Just like they did in 1993.

Flaunting that NRA endorsement a bit, aren’t we Mitt?

I’m not worried about such a thing happening, as the votes aren’t there in Congress. Even if the idea had support, everybody remembers the political fallout from 1994. What gets me is that both men were either so overconfident or so utterly…I don’t know, what’s the opposite of smart?

ETA: It’s interesting that Romney brought up the Fast & Furious debacle, which both Crowley and the President conveniently sidestepped discussing.

Continued...

The Big Stupid, Part II

I would think the Democrats are smart enough to leave gun control alone by now. I’d think that, but apparently, I’d be wrong. They released their 2012 platform [pdf] today, and it includes this happy little chestnut:

We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans’ Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation. We understand the terrible consequences of gun violence; it serves as a reminder that life is fragile, and our time here is limited and precious. We believe in an honest, open national conversation about firearms. We can focus on effective enforcement of existing laws, especially strengthening our background check system, and we can work together to enact commonsense improvements — like reinstating the assault weapons ban and closing the gun show loophole — so that guns do not fall into the hands of those irresponsible, law-breaking few. 

Continued...

The Usual Suspects

None of this is anything new, novel, or unexpected.

Carolyn McCarthy will be presenting a bill [pdf] on Tuesday, as yet un-numbered, to “prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.”  Yes, she’s capitalizing on Saturday’s tragedy in Tuscon.  Yes, it’s revolting.  No, I really don’t expect any better out of her.

Before anyone panics, let’s remember that Ms. McCarthy has attempted to reintroduce the Assault Weapons Ban every single session since 2003.  It has never made it out of committee.  Tuesday’s bill will be met with the same crushing apathy.  It will not pass.

Next, consider Peter King’s proposed bill to ban the carry of firearms within 1000 feet of a federal official.  Such a thing is utterly unfeasible to implement.  Would police have to pat down every WalMart customer when a local politician goes shopping?  What happens when your Senator wants to go to the range? 

Continued...

I love Mondays

This week, 23 state Attorney Generals signed off on a letter (pdf) to Attorney General Eric Holder, in which they advised against any sort of renewal of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban. Part of the letter reads,

As Attorneys General, we are committed to defending our constituents’ constitutional rights —including their constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms. This duty is particuarly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Heller decision, which held that the Second Amendment “elevated above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home.” The high court’s landmark decision affirmed that individual Americans have a constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms. We, the undersigned Attorneys General, are staunch defenders of that right and believe that it should not be encroached upon without sound justification — and a clear law enforcement purpose. (…) we believe that additional gun control laws are unnecessary.

Continued...

Time for another amnesty?

So, the debate around Coburn’s amendment to the Credit Card Holder’s Bill of Rights brings up several possibilities.

The one I’ve heard most of is reversing the Hughes Amendment to the FOPA. If you’re unfamiliar with it, I suggest reading up here. It’s a long but enlightening read.

The Hughes Amendment made it “unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun except in the case of a machinegun that was lawfully possessed before the date of enactment.” In plain terms, civilians cannot procure machineguns made after 1986.

The primary effect was to reduce the supply to a pre-existing pool of weapons, therefore raising prices through the roof. You want a machinegun? Find someone who already owns one and convince them to sell it to you. They can ask pretty much whatever they want.

Like many people, I’d like to see the Hughes Amendment repealed, but I know that the chances of such a thing are pretty much nil.

Continued...

Mixed Signals on Gun Policy

In the wake of last week’s violence in New York and Pittsburg, it’s not unwise to expect calls for new gun restrictions. Couple that with this administration’s published stance regarding gun rights, and we all have reason to be worried.

However, it looks like the current administration is learning from history, and they’re not salivating over gun control as rabidly as they were fifteen years ago.

In an interview with Katie Couric, Eric Holder quickly backpedaled on his prior support for a new Assault Weapons Ban, stating,

I don’t think it has and in fact, I look forward to working with the NRA to come up with ways in which we can use common-sense approaches to reduce the level of violence that we see in our streets and make the American people as safe as they can possibly be.

When prodded further, all the elaboration he’d give about his support for gun control was,

These are issues that we’ll have to discuss.

Continued...

OMG! AWB!

So, here we go. Yet again. The whole thing is getting tiresome, and I’ve got a sneaking suspicion I haven’t heard the last of it.

It works like this:

  1. Someone in the current administration says, “hey, wouldn’t it be great to bring the Assault Weapons Ban back?”
  2. People on the internet (or Bob over in accounting, who “knows guns”), who have no clue how politics works, go into apoplexy. They start screaming that the Last Days have come, and discuss how they’re going to cope. Usually this involves the phrase, “from my cold dead hands.”
  3. I am regaled, via internet and in person, by these people. I get hoarse and very sick of explaining political reality to them.
  4. It turns out that the comments made by said official turn out to have no real gravity or effect.
  5. Internet people come down off the roof, grumbling that we “dodged a bullet…this time.”

Continued...

Obama’s Gun Policies: Spin vs. Fact

So, the new President has transplanted his proposed policies from his own site directly to the official White House site. Under the “Urban Policies” header, we have a blueprint for his ideas on gun control.

Spin: Obama and Biden would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade.

Fact: This is a defacto gun registry. The Federal government will have access to all information a buyer includes on Form 4473, without having to obtain a warrant or prove cause. Remember, Obama voted for the Patriot Act, which included the ability of the government to engage in wiretaps on citizens without warrants.

Spin: Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals.

Continued...