Mitt Romney

2 posts

Yep, He Went There

In tonight’s debate, the President was asked point-blank if he’d support a ban on “assault weapons.” His answer was an unequivocable yes. It’s a bit ironic, since he acknowledged that most of the violence in his hometown was carried out with “cheap handguns” rather than AK-47’s.

This places him on shaky rhetorical ground when he claims to support the 2nd Amendment, but the shocking thing is that Governor Romney implied that he’d support it if it “provided opportunities for both [sides] that both wanted.” Just like they did in 1993.

Flaunting that NRA endorsement a bit, aren’t we Mitt?

I’m not worried about such a thing happening, as the votes aren’t there in Congress. Even if the idea had support, everybody remembers the political fallout from 1994. What gets me is that both men were either so overconfident or so utterly…I don’t know, what’s the opposite of smart?

ETA: It’s interesting that Romney brought up the Fast & Furious debacle, which both Crowley and the President conveniently sidestepped discussing.

Continued...

Revisionism

It’s already begun. Mitt Romney showed up at the NRA convention Friday and gave a keynote address that boiled down to “Obama’s going to take your guns, but I’m the guy who’s going to fight for you right to keep them!”

Nice try, Mitt, but some of us have long memories. We remember who supported the original Assault Weapons Ban in 1993, and we haven’t forgotten who signed off on a permanent extension of Massachusetts’ state-level equivalent in 2004. Signing up for an NRA life membership two years later doesn’t erase that.

Frankly, I don’t expect the guy to push for the 2nd Amendment if he gets elected. I don’t think we can even expect a wizened little shove. The best we’ll get is that he stays out of the way of the progress we’re making.

Is the situation ideal? Nope. But politics isn’t about the ideal; it’s about what’s practical and achievable.

Continued...