Dick Metcalf

2 posts

More on Metcalf

Guns & Ammo is feeling the backlash from Dick Metcalf’s editorial last week. Metcalf has been terminated effective immediately, and Editor Jim Bequette will be stepping down in advance of his January 1st retirement.

From the announcement:

I made a mistake by publishing the column. I thought it would generate a healthy exchange of ideas on gun rights. I miscalculated, pure and simple. I was wrong, and ask for your forgiveness.

And for what? Are we so thin-skinned and hypersensitive as a culture that we can’t brook a little disagreement now and then?

Yes, Metcalf stepped in it. Yes, his article was rife with errors and bordered on incoherence. Yes, it was a little offensive. Does that justify calling him a traitor, or a communist, or other unprintable things? The sheer childishness and incivility borders on the surreal.

Yes, the Brady Campaign made a big deal of it. No, it’s not giving them any succor they didn’t already have.

Continued...

The Metcalf Thing

Dick Metcalf has a back-page editorial [pdf] in this month’s Guns & Ammo that seems to have annoyed a few folks. The guy can be divisive, but then again, most gun writers are at some point. Some of the troubling things Charles Askins or Bill Jordan said over the years have faded into selective recollection, but things are different now. The internet never forgets.

Metcalf refers to regulation as the “initial criterion” of the 2nd Amendment. While that statement is not wrong in and of itself, he takes things off in a surreal and rambling direction.

I bring this up because way too many gun owners still seem to believe that any regulation of the right to keep and bear arms is an infringement. The fact is, all constitutional rights are regulated, always have been, and need to be.

This is the part where he hacked off no small amount of people.

Continued...