The Senate has refused to hear witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Trump. It’s not the cover-up Pelosi and Schiff are claiming. They brought the articles to the Senate (with no small amount of ridiculous grade-school theater) under the assertion that they had an unassailable case, backed by compelling evidence.
Apparently, they don’t. Well, that’s their problem. Let’s run through the whole 2016 narrative, shall we?
- Donald Trump personally worked with Vladimir Putin to sway the election! We have evidence, but we won’t show you just yet. Well, OK. We don’t have evidence.
- Here’s a fake report from the “intelligence community.” That’s evidence, right? No? OK.
- Let’s talk about Stormy Daniels. She…what? Russia? That was last week.
- OK. OK. We’ve got it. There’s this thing called the Emoluments Clause. We’ll use some big words to confuse people, and…oh for $%&* sake.
- Two scoops of iced cream. TWO SCOOPS, people!
- So, that Russia thing?
Continued...